― Shannon L. Alder
Similar to Type I Diabetes, Type I BPD manifests early in life, will impact multiple systems, and requires medical treatment in addition to lifestyle changes. Type I BPD would be present in the 80-60 percent of cases where CSA, trauma, or neglect are reported. These instances will most likely have multiple diagnoses of PTSD, RAD, or DSED along with BPD (Binks, 2006). The proclivity of comorbidity of Type I BPD can muddy treatment goals and overwhelm resources, providers, and family/social supports.
It is estimated that 90 percent of people with BPD attempt suicide at a 10 percent completion rate (Aguirre, 2007, p. 201). The rate of death due to diabetes is also 10 percent (National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014). An additional commonality between Type I BPD and Diabetes is neuropathy. With diabetes, weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in extremities occurs. The resulting numbness can prevent people from noticing when they have a wound or injury. These injuries can then fester, become infected, and result in amputations. An emotional and relational equivalent also occurs in people with Type I BPD. They have experienced an emotional numbness that, when not addressed, can exacerbate relational wounds or injuries which fester to the extent the relationship requires amputation. This does not mean relationship repair is impossible. However, there are times when damage sustained from someone with BPD is so severe, the other person in the relationship is unwilling or unable to risk additional harm.
Initial Treatment
To summarize, Type I BPD is evident in people who have a history of trauma, complex/compound trauma, unhealthy attachments, self-harm, likely multiple acute psychiatric hospitalizations, and symptoms have been pervasive since adolescents. Type I BPD will require long term treatment due to inherent distrust, emotional lability, and difficulty with attachment/joining. Emotional neuropathy may require multiple specialists to address specific symptoms while an overarching therapy is maintained. This could include EMDR, DBT, CBT, or IOP.
This information is important to help understand and delineate types of BPD in order to specifically target forms of treatment in order to increase positive prognosis. As with any other diagnosis, knowing severity is important to assist in setting expectations and arranging necessary supports. If providers view every BPD case the same way, they may provide too many, or too few, resources. More research needs to be done to help clinically identify forms of BPD. Gestational BPD, a suggestion on how new research can be done, and how it may impact treatment will be covered in part III.
Phi (C) 2016, Nathan D. Croy |
Aguirre, B. A., M.D. (2007). Borderline Personality Disorder in Adolescents: A complete guide to understanding and coping when your adolescent has BPD (1st ed.). Beverly, MA: Fair Winds Press.
Boeree, C. G. (2006). Viktor Frankl. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/frankl.html
Buber, M., & Kaufmann, W. A. (1996). I and Thou: Martin Buber; a new translation with a prologue “I and You” and notes. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 200-207. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.505.6866&rep=rep1&type=pdf
van Deurzen, E. (2012). Existential counselling & psychotherapy in practice. London: SAGE.
National Diabetes Statistics Report. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf
As I read through your post about BPD types, as a good clinician I began thinking through how I would more quickly differentiate the two types in session. Since most of my work with clients and patients is informed by attachment based interventions and psycho-dynamic theories, I imagine that in addition to gaining a good history of trauma, I might notice stronger emotional lability, more resistance to forming a therapeutic relationship, and/or a severely restrictive affect from a type 1 PBD client. What would you say?
Another thing that stood out to me in this post is your description of BPD 2 and how many seem "more wealthy." I'm thinking that folks with BPD 2 are more able to mask their attachment issues and minimize the relational consequences. My old supervisor used to say that "wealth is the best enabler" because clients can just keep jumping from therapist to therapist and ignore the attachment issues that arise in session. I also thought of how many of my chemical dependency patients tend to operate in a similar way – using their substance of choice to ignore psychological, social and spiritual health issues. Chemical dependency patients often seem to act in a "borderline way" while they are in the clutches of their addiction. I don't think that's an accident.
Couldn't agree more. In fact, there's a great TED Talk on addiction as it relates to attachment you should check out (link at bottom of this reply). The point, though, is that people are designed for attachment and any attachment will do. If money, drugs, ETOH, or anything else is available and it seems safer or more accessible than healthy/genuine attachment, they will attach. EFT talks about this a great deal! When I reference Frankl's noogenic neurosis/existential vacuum in the above post, this is what I'm referring to. That existential vacuum is universal in humanity! We MUST attach to others because it is in that I-Thou relationship where our "I" is affirmed.
Thank you so much for the comment and wise words. I miss working with you! Hope you enjoy the linked video.
https://youtu.be/ypsJrRwlspo